Idk.... but phobe implies a fear. Most so called "homophobes" arent afraid of gays, they just disagree with the choice and lifestyle
I do remember when we asked you for a real reason why you personally opposed allowing it and you couldn't come up with shit other than "they can't reproduce". Enough of you. =;
Idk.... but phobe implies a fear. Most so called "homophobes" arent afraid of gays, they just disagree with the choice and lifestyle
I call bullshit on that. Why would they disagree with something that has been proven time and time again to be completely natural and normal? I think they are afraid of themselves. There was a study done on homophobic and non homophobic men. They had something strapped to their dicks to measure their arousal. They were both shown gay porn and it showed that the homophobic men were significantly more aroused by it than the non-homophobic men. ;;)
Santorum has less of a chance than Ron Paul of getting the nomination seeing Obama would have his head on a pike in general Election. Romney and Paul are the only 2 who could even manage a defense and Romney will get obliterated on his Corporations defense
WakeOfAshesPosts: 21,665destroyer of motherfuckers
Santorum has less of a chance than Ron Paul of getting the nomination seeing Obama would have his head on a pike in general Election. Romney and Paul are the only 2 who could even manage a defense and Romney will get obliterated on his Corporations defense
So the news from Iowa is that Ron Paul won independents 8-1. These Independents that voted for Ron Paul are typically categorized as being a third from Democrat leaning and maybe half from Republican leaning.
I was reading this pro-Romney poll that was polling how the election would be if Ron Paul was a independent candidate or not. Now this article didnt even consider Paul being the Republican nomination which I think is a joke. But check this out:
And then consider this.... Say the Republican nomination was Ron Paul instead of Mitt Romney. Do you think any of that 32% that voted for Mitt Romney would instead vote for Obama instead of Paul? Answer - Fuck no. That 32% in the red, and that 42% in the blue are pretty much die hard R's and D's and they are 100% voting party lines regardless of the candidate. If Ron Paul was the Republican nomination he would crush Obama beating him in the popular vote by something like 42% to 53%.
Idk.... but phobe implies a fear. Most so called "homophobes" arent afraid of gays, they just disagree with the choice and lifestyle
I do remember when we asked you for a real reason why you personally opposed allowing it and you couldn't come up with shit other than "they can't reproduce". Enough of you. =;
w/e
Idk.... but phobe implies a fear. Most so called "homophobes" arent afraid of gays, they just disagree with the choice and lifestyle
I call bullshit on that. Why would they disagree with something that has been proven time and time again to be completely natural and normal? I think they are afraid of themselves. There was a study done on homophobic and non homophobic men. They had something strapped to their dicks to measure their arousal. They were both shown gay porn and it showed that the homophobic men were significantly more aroused by it than the non-homophobic men. ;;)
if it was really that natural and "normal" the human race would cease to exist
if it was really that natural and "normal" the human race would cease to exist
Then why does it occur in nature in over 400 species of animals? Dolphins and bonobos have sex for pleasure and will have gay partners. Does it mean that ALL of them do it? No, it doesn't. Also, do you think it's wrong for people such as myself who want to make themselves sterile and make it impossible for them to reproduce?
Do you realize how huge the range of people's sexuality is? Even though I believe it's a little outdated (and I've probably posted about this here a million times), look up the Kinsey scale. Alfred Kinsey did a lifetime of work on recording how people have sex and sexual orientations and that is how he created this scale. It ranges from 0-6. 0 is exclusively heterosexual and 6 is exclusively homosexual. He found from his detailed reports of tens of thousands of people that most people's sexuality fall into 1-5. Kinsey himself believed he was a 3 on the scale.
Also, do you choose to be straight? Do you choose what kind of food you like? Do you choose which specific people you are attracted to?
Have you ever looked up the studies done on homosexual men and women? It's all primarily homosexual men, but I would look it up. Can you please explain to me why a homosexual man's brain is almost identical to a heterosexual female's brain? Can you explain to me why a homosexual woman's brain is almost identical to a heterosexual man's brain?
Last question. I'm assuming that you think homosexuality is wrong because of religious beliefs. The only part in the Bible that says it's wrong, or as it puts it, "an abomination" is Leviticus. If you agree with that, then why aren't you this concerned about people who eat shellfish, wear polyester cotton blends, people with tattoos, women who have sex on their periods, or women who aren't virgins getting married, and everything else that this passage labels as an "abomination"?
Sorry for all the questions, but I am extremely curious how you feel about all of them.
Yes i choose to be straight. Im not attracted to dudes, but i choose not to pursue them... food has nothing to do with sex, but no... yes. I really care bout personality, and that detetmines who im attracted to. I chose the personality that attracts me
As for the studys theres alot of studys pointing both ways so it depends on what your looking for, and what you choose to believe.
The food and clothing restrictions were done away with in the new testament. Idk bout tats. And i believe premarital sex is wrong.
no MC, there is not studys that go both ways...i know your young and have good intentions but youve been brainwashed pretty well and are embarasssing yourself evertime this topic gets brought up..i think it would do you well to just pled the 5th on this topic for the future lol
Yes i choose to be straight. Im not attracted to dudes, but i choose not to pursue them... food has nothing to do with sex, but no... yes. I really care bout personality, and that detetmines who im attracted to. I chose the personality that attracts me
As for the studys theres alot of studys pointing both ways so it depends on what your looking for, and what you choose to believe.
The food and clothing restrictions were done away with in the new testament. Idk bout tats. And i believe premarital sex is wrong.
Please show me studies that have proof of brain scans and other detailed reports with years and decades worth of work, evidence, and case studies done by several people that prove that homosexuality isn't natural. I would also like sources that are not outdated and don't have any religious bias behind them. And can you please explain to me why homosexual behavior occurs in over 400 species of animals if it's not natural?
And were you saying you think it's wrong for people like me to purposely make themselves sterile? And if so please explain why.
That is absolutely ridiculous that you choose to be straight. You just said you are not attracted to them. You do not choose to be attracted to anyone. Ask yourself if you could honestly make yourself be attracted to a man. Hard, right? It's because you don't choose those things. And you mentioned personality is a factor when being attracted to someone. You can choose who to be with, but you can't choose what is appealing to you. This is why I brought up food. It's the same thing. Don't you think it's ridiculous to say that even though something tastes good to you, you choose not to like it? That's not how it works.
Also, do you think it's wrong for people such as myself who want to make themselves sterile and make it impossible for them to reproduce?
no cute little BT's running around. (
There are plenty of good children that people give away. And I won't get fat.
Yes i choose to be straight. Im not attracted to dudes, but i choose not to pursue them... food has nothing to do with sex, but no... yes. I really care bout personality, and that detetmines who im attracted to. I chose the personality that attracts me
As for the studys theres alot of studys pointing both ways so it depends on what your looking for, and what you choose to believe.
The food and clothing restrictions were done away with in the new testament. Idk bout tats. And i believe premarital sex is wrong.
you didn't choose to be straight, your brain is just hard wired that way. no choice involved whatsoever. the choice is you showing your ignorance on the subject. Gays brains are hardwired different than straight people. its not an opinion, its scientific fact. i think you've spent too much time at Michelle Bachmann's husbands Pray the gay away clinic
Comments
One that fears or is averse to a specified thing:
averse:
adjective
having a strong feeling of opposition, antipathy, repugnance, etc.; opposed:
I was reading this pro-Romney poll that was polling how the election would be if Ron Paul was a independent candidate or not. Now this article didnt even consider Paul being the Republican nomination which I think is a joke. But check this out:
And then consider this.... Say the Republican nomination was Ron Paul instead of Mitt Romney. Do you think any of that 32% that voted for Mitt Romney would instead vote for Obama instead of Paul? Answer - Fuck no. That 32% in the red, and that 42% in the blue are pretty much die hard R's and D's and they are 100% voting party lines regardless of the candidate. If Ron Paul was the Republican nomination he would crush Obama beating him in the popular vote by something like 42% to 53%.
Do you realize how huge the range of people's sexuality is? Even though I believe it's a little outdated (and I've probably posted about this here a million times), look up the Kinsey scale. Alfred Kinsey did a lifetime of work on recording how people have sex and sexual orientations and that is how he created this scale. It ranges from 0-6. 0 is exclusively heterosexual and 6 is exclusively homosexual. He found from his detailed reports of tens of thousands of people that most people's sexuality fall into 1-5. Kinsey himself believed he was a 3 on the scale.
Also, do you choose to be straight? Do you choose what kind of food you like? Do you choose which specific people you are attracted to?
Have you ever looked up the studies done on homosexual men and women? It's all primarily homosexual men, but I would look it up. Can you please explain to me why a homosexual man's brain is almost identical to a heterosexual female's brain? Can you explain to me why a homosexual woman's brain is almost identical to a heterosexual man's brain?
Last question. I'm assuming that you think homosexuality is wrong because of religious beliefs. The only part in the Bible that says it's wrong, or as it puts it, "an abomination" is Leviticus. If you agree with that, then why aren't you this concerned about people who eat shellfish, wear polyester cotton blends, people with tattoos, women who have sex on their periods, or women who aren't virgins getting married, and everything else that this passage labels as an "abomination"?
Sorry for all the questions, but I am extremely curious how you feel about all of them.
no cute little BT's running around.
Yes i choose to be straight. Im not attracted to dudes, but i choose not to pursue them... food has nothing to do with sex, but no... yes. I really care bout personality, and that detetmines who im attracted to. I chose the personality that attracts me
As for the studys theres alot of studys pointing both ways so it depends on what your looking for, and what you choose to believe.
The food and clothing restrictions were done away with in the new testament. Idk bout tats. And i believe premarital sex is wrong.
And were you saying you think it's wrong for people like me to purposely make themselves sterile? And if so please explain why.
That is absolutely ridiculous that you choose to be straight. You just said you are not attracted to them. You do not choose to be attracted to anyone. Ask yourself if you could honestly make yourself be attracted to a man. Hard, right? It's because you don't choose those things. And you mentioned personality is a factor when being attracted to someone. You can choose who to be with, but you can't choose what is appealing to you. This is why I brought up food. It's the same thing. Don't you think it's ridiculous to say that even though something tastes good to you, you choose not to like it? That's not how it works. There are plenty of good children that people give away. And I won't get fat.