Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Bin Laden Dead!!!! America, Fuck Yeah!!!

1222325272850

Comments

  • Bottle_TreeBottle_Tree Posts: 7,166 just the tip
    edited May 2011
    fake, it has to be, theres a 99.99999% chance those seals were firing 5.56 nato rounds. no 5.56 is gonna blow your fucking head off like that
    Well I read a quote from a senator who saw the photo (that I now cannot find) who said that the shot blew off part of his head, left his brains visible, and blew out his left eye as well as being very bloody. That could still just be a photoshop, but it's close to what he was describing.
    Kinda late, but that pic is shooped. All the pictures you find are all shooped. Look at the lower half of the head.

    And Wake, you have a very good point on Lincoln. By today's standards he would be considered a racist, lol. He didn't give a shit about black people.
  • EpisodeEpisode Posts: 32,049 destroyer of motherfuckers
    fake, it has to be, theres a 99.99999% chance those seals were firing 5.56 nato rounds. no 5.56 is gonna blow your fucking head off like that
    Well I read a quote from a senator who saw the photo (that I now cannot find) who said that the shot blew off part of his head, left his brains visible, and blew out his left eye as well as being very bloody. That could still just be a photoshop, but it's close to what he was describing.
    Kinda late, but that pic is shooped. All the pictures you find are all shooped. Look at the lower half of the head.

    And Wake, you have a very good point on Lincoln. By today's standards he would be considered a racist, lol. He didn't give a shit about black people.
    Please tell me you're fucking kidding me...

    He fought for equality, there was no oppression on whites, it was all on blacks. Yea, he didn't give a shit so much that he fought for their equal rights. Give me a fucking break.

  • That_Guy_ArloThat_Guy_Arlo Posts: 14,026 master of ceremonies
    fake, it has to be, theres a 99.99999% chance those seals were firing 5.56 nato rounds. no 5.56 is gonna blow your fucking head off like that
    Well I read a quote from a senator who saw the photo (that I now cannot find) who said that the shot blew off part of his head, left his brains visible, and blew out his left eye as well as being very bloody. That could still just be a photoshop, but it's close to what he was describing.
    Kinda late, but that pic is shooped. All the pictures you find are all shooped. Look at the lower half of the head.

    And Wake, you have a very good point on Lincoln. By today's standards he would be considered a racist, lol. He didn't give a shit about black people.
    Please tell me you're fucking kidding me...

    He fought for equality, there was no oppression on whites, it was all on blacks. Yea, he didn't give a shit so much that he fought for their equal rights. Give me a fucking break.

    Erik have you actually looked hard into studying Lincoln's views?
  • NolaFree810NolaFree810 Posts: 36,796 moneytalker
    edited May 2011
    well i have actually and i think bottle tree has it a little wrong. was lincoln a civil rights hero?? far from it but through his writings and speeches he does seem to genuinely be anti slavery.
  • NolaFree810NolaFree810 Posts: 36,796 moneytalker
    and by todays standards 99 percent of the 1860's american public would be considered racists lol
  • That_Guy_ArloThat_Guy_Arlo Posts: 14,026 master of ceremonies
    well i have actually and i think bottle tree has it a little wrong. was lincoln a civil rights hero?? far from it but through his writings and speeches he does seem to genuinely be anti slavery.
    Anti-slavery doesn't necessarily mean that he supported it because of wanting to end black oppression.
  • EpisodeEpisode Posts: 32,049 destroyer of motherfuckers
    Lol, ignorance runs in the family, eh?
  • Bottle_TreeBottle_Tree Posts: 7,166 just the tip


    Please tell me you're fucking kidding me...

    He fought for equality, there was no oppression on whites, it was all on blacks. Yea, he didn't give a shit so much that he fought for their equal rights. Give me a fucking break.

    It's true, by today's standards Lincoln would be considered a racist. He didn't think black people were equal to white people. There's many books out there to quote him on it.

  • NolaFree810NolaFree810 Posts: 36,796 moneytalker
    true but its hard to know the real reason behind any person of offices stance......all i can say is based on what i read it would appear to be that he was more on the abloitionist side of view at the time than the slavery side, regardless of any preserving the union type agenda
  • NolaFree810NolaFree810 Posts: 36,796 moneytalker


    Please tell me you're fucking kidding me...

    He fought for equality, there was no oppression on whites, it was all on blacks. Yea, he didn't give a shit so much that he fought for their equal rights. Give me a fucking break.

    It's true, by today's standards Lincoln would be considered a racist. He didn't think black people were equal to white people. There's many books out there to quote him on it.

    and by todays standards 99 percent of the 1860's american public would be considered racists lol
  • Bottle_TreeBottle_Tree Posts: 7,166 just the tip
    Here's a few links to show you that, again, by TODAY'S standards Lincoln was a racist.

    http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa082800a.htm
    http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/10/abraham-lincoln-racist/
    http://albensonjr.com/mrlincolntheracist.shtml
    http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2009/02/09/was-lincoln-a-racist/

    It was hard for me to learn about this when I first did. A teacher in high school showed me a book with a bunch of quotes to support this that were highlighted.
  • myplagueRobmyplagueRob Posts: 1,375
    fake, it has to be, theres a 99.99999% chance those seals were firing 5.56 nato rounds. no 5.56 is gonna blow your fucking head off like that
    Well I read a quote from a senator who saw the photo (that I now cannot find) who said that the shot blew off part of his head, left his brains visible, and blew out his left eye as well as being very bloody. That could still just be a photoshop, but it's close to what he was describing.
    Kinda late, but that pic is shooped. All the pictures you find are all shooped. Look at the lower half of the head.

    And Wake, you have a very good point on Lincoln. By today's standards he would be considered a racist, lol. He didn't give a shit about black people.
    Yeah I know that picture is shopped, but it shows almost exactly what the one senator described. Which was the only point I was trying to make to Shane.
  • That_Guy_ArloThat_Guy_Arlo Posts: 14,026 master of ceremonies
    Lol, ignorance runs in the family, eh?
    Where have you learned about Lincoln?
  • Bottle_TreeBottle_Tree Posts: 7,166 just the tip
    and by todays standards 99 percent of the 1860's american public would be considered racists lol
    Sorry for not replying to you, lol. I agree with you, I'm just saying that a lot of people tend to believe that Lincoln had very different ideas when it comes to slavery from other people of that time when in fact that wasn't true. Like when people compared to Obama to Lincoln, I would say he's more like FDR.

  • NolaFree810NolaFree810 Posts: 36,796 moneytalker
    yea and i should read that lincoln racist book, it seems interesing....histroy is such a crazy topic you really never know what is the real truth behind much of anything
  • That_Guy_ArloThat_Guy_Arlo Posts: 14,026 master of ceremonies
    yea and i should read that lincoln racist book, it seems interesing....histroy is such a crazy topic you really never know what is the real truth behind much of anything
    You mean Columbus wasn't the first person in history to discover America and that he actually didn't treat the Native Americans like royalty?
  • WakeOfAshesWakeOfAshes Posts: 21,665 destroyer of motherfuckers


    And Wake, you have a very good point on Lincoln. By today's standards he would be considered a racist, lol. He didn't give a shit about black people.
    probably not. ;) If I had to guess, I believe Lincoln probably would be personally against slavery. However it was not something that was high on his importance list as we are taught to believe. It was absolutely a tool he leveraged to drive his agenda. Which was keeping the states together and a strong central gov
  • Bottle_TreeBottle_Tree Posts: 7,166 just the tip
    yea and i should read that lincoln racist book, it seems interesing....histroy is such a crazy topic you really never know what is the real truth behind much of anything
    For reals. Schools really sugar coat a lot of things, and teachers don't really express the things that are wrong in text books.

    Hell, in Texas they were considering (I'm not sure if they already went through with it or not...) leaving out the 9 Mexicans who helped defend the Alamo out of the text books along with a bunch of other bullshit fueled by racism.
  • Chicken_FuckerChicken_Fucker Posts: 15,691 destroyer of motherfuckers


    And Wake, you have a very good point on Lincoln. By today's standards he would be considered a racist, lol. He didn't give a shit about black people.
    probably not. ;) If I had to guess, I believe Lincoln probably would be personally against slavery. However it was not something that was high on his importance list as we are taught to believe. It was absolutely a tool he leveraged to drive his agenda. Which was keeping the states together and a strong central gov
    A politician with an agenda? GTFO :O
  • WakeOfAshesWakeOfAshes Posts: 21,665 destroyer of motherfuckers
    well i have actually and i think bottle tree has it a little wrong. was lincoln a civil rights hero?? far from it but through his writings and speeches he does seem to genuinely be anti slavery.
    And it kills me that we are taught he was a civil rights hero, and that the back community typically remembers him as such. He probably was personally against slavery (maybe), but it is very clear form his writings that his focus on the slave issues were done only to form a strong central federal gov.

    did you know that the emancipation proclamation freed not one slave. Slaves were already free in the areas that it covered.
Sign In or Register to comment.