I forgot..if any stupid motherfucker says you raped them, it's automatic truth
Its guilty until proven innocent with rape
Actually that's how it goes with any crime now thanks to biased/twisted/misinformed news and media. People can change that though, but not enough people give a shit to which is a shame.
I forgot..if any stupid motherfucker says you raped them, it's automatic truth
Its guilty until proven innocent with rape
? Aren't under 10% of rapists actually convicted
I don't know if that's true but I wouldn't be surprised. Most assaults are never reported for various reasons. And the fucktards that come out and claim so, lying about it, discredits the true cases. It's all a shit show
Not sure how it's pathetic to see a bad field here and think everyone is pretty awful and then one that I'm not thrilled about, but relatively okay with.
I'm not sure I'd call Clinton a bully, but she's a pretty good politician regardless of if she's a liar or not. I have no particular insight into her character, so I don't really think about it much.
It's not just you. It's the general spineless, bend-over-and-take-it type of thinking so many people have towards politics. Beyond that, environmental and civil liberty issues don't seem to mean much to you. It's all economy, but while economic numbers might look peachy, I don't see many normal people capitalizing. The recession ended up being a huge real estate grab for the banks. Student loans are pretty much slavery. It's a fairly common joke that Millenial grads are facing a barren job market.
I don't think that's true. I think that it's all about the best alternative. The alternative to my current position is not vote, which doesn't really do anything. My views on civil liberties greatly outweigh my economic views, which are why I consider myself a liberal anyway. If I didn't care about people, I'd vote GOP. Politicians like Sanders would just ruin our lives economically and then legalize weed or something. Not an even trade.
The recession made everything worse for everyone, except investors who had cash in 2009 and capitalized. Banks now have an incredible amount of regulatory oversight, a real accomplishment, in my opinion. They'd break themselves up to get rid of Dodd Frank, I'd bet.
Student loans aren't slavery unless you're an idiot. Going into debt to get a degree only makes sense if the degree you're getting is worth the long term cost of the debt. Going into student loan debt to get a ceramics degree is like getting a $1MM mortgage on an outhouse. You can't blame the bank for that. Besides, just like homes before the Great Recession, the only reason college costs so much is that the government tries to subsidize its cost. All it does is incentivize colleges to raise tuition.
I don't see how you could look at the NSA's capabilities or how the police harass and slaughter people as acceptable. America is a myth that people buy into because they're scared of uncertainty. It's lazy. Things could be so much better here than they are
This is the first time in my life I've come across someone essentially defending getting into student loan debt
Going into student loan debt is a good decision for a lot of people, as long as what they're doing into debt for makes sense. There's a reason most people do it. A lot of people just don't make the right decisions about their degree.
I don't see how you could look at the NSA's capabilities or how the police harass and slaughter people as acceptable. America is a myth that people buy into because they're scared of uncertainty. It's lazy. Things could be so much better here than they are
Yeah, I don't know what I said that makes you think that I find that okay, because I don't. I'm pretty much in line with most dems on those issues. It's pretty weird that you think I sound like PR for Goldman Sachs. What do you have against Goldman Sachs other than most people have made them a poster child for greed? Banks like GS do a lot more for America/the world than a socialist president would. Idk why it's so controversial that I think America is in fine, but not perfect shape; and trying a grand political experiment that has failed in many other countries is not a good idea.
Because you live out in the sticks. There's some evil/crazy young women today. I've had one dude I work with accused by a girl he told he didn't want to start a relationship with. Then another kid I work with has this crazy girlfriend that we've all told him he needs to distance himself from. Well apparently when she isn't threatening to kill herself if he doesn't drive 2 hours to see her at school, she threatens to accuse him of rape. He showed us the message. I told him to screen cap it and end it with her. But no he's still with her.
Comments
:-<
The recession made everything worse for everyone, except investors who had cash in 2009 and capitalized. Banks now have an incredible amount of regulatory oversight, a real accomplishment, in my opinion. They'd break themselves up to get rid of Dodd Frank, I'd bet.
Student loans aren't slavery unless you're an idiot. Going into debt to get a degree only makes sense if the degree you're getting is worth the long term cost of the debt. Going into student loan debt to get a ceramics degree is like getting a $1MM mortgage on an outhouse. You can't blame the bank for that. Besides, just like homes before the Great Recession, the only reason college costs so much is that the government tries to subsidize its cost. All it does is incentivize colleges to raise tuition.
I don't see how you could look at the NSA's capabilities or how the police harass and slaughter people as acceptable. America is a myth that people buy into because they're scared of uncertainty. It's lazy. Things could be so much better here than they are
Yeah, I don't know what I said that makes you think that I find that okay, because I don't. I'm pretty much in line with most dems on those issues. It's pretty weird that you think I sound like PR for Goldman Sachs. What do you have against Goldman Sachs other than most people have made them a poster child for greed? Banks like GS do a lot more for America/the world than a socialist president would. Idk why it's so controversial that I think America is in fine, but not perfect shape; and trying a grand political experiment that has failed in many other countries is not a good idea.