i don't feel like her mother had a single bit to do with it. if you watched the trial and saw cindys breakdowns, you may feel the same way.
i watched it everyday....its obvious all three of them were pathological liars...people who lie like that have the ability to believe every word they say and make that lie become reality....whats stopping her from breaking down and crying if she believes her own lies
WakeOfAshesPosts: 21,665destroyer of motherfuckers
there isn't evidence she killed her...many things could have happened....just because she was a whore and a bad mom doesn't mean she is a killer....many many things could have happened....it is my view that her whole family was in on it....her mom lied on the stand...her father was obviously lying on the stand...i mean who the hell cries like that without having any tears.....i think what ever it was her mom and dad are just as responsible as her
it is funny that those that support her keep saying that "many things could have happened". Okay... Give me one plausible scenario that doesnt involve her.
i don't feel like her mother had a single bit to do with it. if you watched the trial and saw cindys breakdowns, you may feel the same way.
i watched it everyday....its obvious all three of them were pathological liars...people who lie like that have the ability to believe every word they say and make that lie become reality....whats stopping her from breaking down and crying if she believes her own lies
everyone sees things differently. but i don't think cindy had anything to do with it. george, maybe.
almost everyone who says she guilty went by their personal opinion that because she was the mother and the circumstances around that she was automatically guilty not even acknowledging how weak the prosecutions case was
I say she was guilty according to the decomposition evidence they had which places a dead child that was either caylee or similar to caylee in her trunk. She had no explanation for this and the only reasonable explanation is she transported her dead child. If she was not guilty speak up against the evidence they did present.
to my understanding they could never really prove there was a dead body in the trunk....i mean 7 different witness's refuted the claims of it smelling like death...as far as the hair tho i don't know to much about that...but it doesn't seem very plausible to me that you can find a hair and know if it came from a dead or live body
they proved there was a dead body in the truck. but since the prosecution didnt run it over with someone (idr who, i dont know much a bout court stuff ) it got thrown away.
if evidence isn't in the trial? how solid is that evidence really in the first place?
i think a lot of people have been spoiled by dna evidence. we have to remember that there have been centuries of law and order without dna to prove someone was guilty. sometimes, things are just common sense. i think this case is a good example of how we've foregone common sense.
there isn't evidence she killed her...many things could have happened....just because she was a whore and a bad mom doesn't mean she is a killer....many many things could have happened....it is my view that her whole family was in on it....her mom lied on the stand...her father was obviously lying on the stand...i mean who the hell cries like that without having any tears.....i think what ever it was her mom and dad are just as responsible as her
it is funny that those that support her keep saying that "many things could have happened". Okay... Give me one plausible scenario that doesnt involve her.
dad kills her, takes casey's car and dumps her in swap
in terms of the case, i think a lot of people have been spoiled by dna evidence. we have to remember that there have been centuries of law and order without dna to prove someone was guilty. sometimes, things are just common sense. i think this case is a good example of how we've foregone common sense.
MOTHER FUCKING TRUTH. why do they need DNA to prove a case? all the circumstantial evidence was THERE. our court systems have gone retard
there isn't evidence she killed her...many things could have happened....just because she was a whore and a bad mom doesn't mean she is a killer....many many things could have happened....it is my view that her whole family was in on it....her mom lied on the stand...her father was obviously lying on the stand...i mean who the hell cries like that without having any tears.....i think what ever it was her mom and dad are just as responsible as her
it is funny that those that support her keep saying that "many things could have happened". Okay... Give me one plausible scenario that doesnt involve her.
dad kills her, takes casey's car and dumps her in swap
And Casey doesn't notice her kid is gone for a month?
the decomposition evidence got thrown away. the jurors never knew about that.
for reals??? Why the fuck was the most damning evidence throwen out?
if it was that damning the state would have found a way to get it in the trial...its most certainly must have been contaminated and most likely was not as solid as it sounds
WakeOfAshesPosts: 21,665destroyer of motherfuckers
to my understanding they could never really prove there was a dead body in the trunk....i mean 7 different witness's refuted the claims of it smelling like death...as far as the hair tho i don't know to much about that...but it doesn't seem very plausible to me that you can find a hair and know if it came from a dead or live body
Then you haven't read the evidence that was presented. The FBI stated that they could conclusively say there was human decomposition material in her car, and that it came from someone similar to Caylee. They couldnt conclude that it was caylee, but they also didnt rule her out. Basically the FBI's analysis was that there was decomposition material from a approx 2-3 year old child with similar hair as caylee if not the same.
the decomposition evidence got thrown away. the jurors never knew about that.
for reals??? Why the fuck was the most damning evidence throwen out?
if it was that damning the state would have found a way to get it in the trial...its most certainly must have been contaminated and most likely was not as solid as it sounds
It was Caylees decomposed hair/piece of skull in the trunk of the car.
in terms of the case, i think a lot of people have been spoiled by dna evidence. we have to remember that there have been centuries of law and order without dna to prove someone was guilty. sometimes, things are just common sense. i think this case is a good example of how we've foregone common sense.
MOTHER FUCKING TRUTH. why do they need DNA to prove a case? all the circumstantial evidence was THERE. our court systems have gone retard
circumstantial does not prove BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT that she committed murder. this verdict upheld the integrity of the judicial system
there isn't evidence she killed her...many things could have happened....just because she was a whore and a bad mom doesn't mean she is a killer....many many things could have happened....it is my view that her whole family was in on it....her mom lied on the stand...her father was obviously lying on the stand...i mean who the hell cries like that without having any tears.....i think what ever it was her mom and dad are just as responsible as her
it is funny that those that support her keep saying that "many things could have happened". Okay... Give me one plausible scenario that doesnt involve her.
dad kills her, takes casey's car and dumps her in swap
And Casey doesn't notice her kid is gone for a month?
she was a psychopathic crazy women....who probably needed some help....iv see psychologists say that is exactly how someone who was crazy would react in her situation....just because she was crazy doesn't mean she was a killer....im not saying she didn't do it...im just saying the case is no where near as solid as people think...and people should not be so shocked
Comments
And it breaks my heart that no one is going to be punished for killing that beautiful baby girl.
why do they need DNA to prove a case? all the circumstantial evidence was THERE.
our court systems have gone retard
NO.
because the prosecution didn't run it over with someone beforehand. So it got thrown out. It's how our court system is.
i care about a 3 year old that got murdered. i'm such a fool. 8-|
she was a psychopathic crazy women....who probably needed some help....iv see psychologists say that is exactly how someone who was crazy would react in her situation....just because she was crazy doesn't mean she was a killer....im not saying she didn't do it...im just saying the case is no where near as solid as people think...and people should not be so shocked