When Atlanta played Arizona, you beat them 23-19. When Seattle played Arizona 2 weeks later 58-0. I see your 34-0 and raise you 58-0.
Two things you should be worried about.
1. Seattle getting their asses handed to them in the first half on both lines. 2. Tony Gonzalez
We already know why SATAN should be worried though.
Im not fooled. I think Seattle could easily lose this game. I honestly wouldnt put money on either side. I like Seattle's chances, but to me it's not as big of a sure thing as NE over Houston. The only game I'd consider betting on this weekend is NE.
drinkwine732Posts: 20,418destroyer of motherfuckers
Well, now that you've brought up betting, I have to point out the lines for this week.
BRONCOS (-10) vs Ravens 49ERS (-3) vs Packers FALCONS (-2.5) vs Seahawks PATRIOTS (-9.5) vs Texans
I don't want a part in any of these games. I'd consider taking the Seahawks if the line was 3.5, but I just don't trust the Falcons enough. I think the Packers might be a good bet too.
WakeOfAshesPosts: 21,665destroyer of motherfuckers
No... I dont think they are. Manning is in the last couple years of his playing career. Luck is just starting and looks phenomenal. Had manning been teh colts starter this year, I dont believe they would have made the playoffs.
drinkwine732Posts: 20,418destroyer of motherfuckers
Actually, I agree with Wake, but for different reasons. Freeing up Manning's contract allowed Grigson to completely retool that roster, and with the Colts still being responsible for Manning's massive contract, I doubt they'd have been able to do the retooling that allowed them to make the playoffs. Also, if you give me a choice, I'd rather have a 23 year old Luck than a 36 year old Manning.
Also, if you give me a choice, I'd rather have a 23 year old Luck than a 36 year old Manning.
In context, sure. If both were given the same contract and competent teammates on offense? Absolutely not. Luck is good, but not a perfect specimen of a quarterback yet. He still made rookie mistakes.
Comments
you hurd it here first
1. Seattle getting their asses handed to them in the first half on both lines against Washington.
2. Tony Gonzalez
We already know why SATAN should be worried though.
BRONCOS (-10) vs Ravens
49ERS (-3) vs Packers
FALCONS (-2.5) vs Seahawks
PATRIOTS (-9.5) vs Texans
I don't want a part in any of these games. I'd consider taking the Seahawks if the line was 3.5, but I just don't trust the Falcons enough. I think the Packers might be a good bet too.
DEN/BAL - 46
SF/GB - 45
SEA/ATL - 45.5
HOU/NWE - 48
Think that the Texans/Patriots O/U is way too low. Like the Ravens/Broncos one too. I always get burned by ones that I think are like that, I'm kind of timid. I don't trust Baltimore's defense, and the Broncos one is legit.
(cause you automatically get 3 points for being at home)