It's good for what it is, but at that stage it also sucked. It was still Pre-Alpha and was closed to the public for a reason. So I will see how this new one will be like.
Lets port it to 360 and compress everything herp derp. PS3 has no compression thx to blu ray and since you can fit GBs upon GBs, you can make the graphics 10x better, along with the audio and detail.
Lets port it to 360 and compress everything herp derp. PS3 has no compression thx to blu ray and since you can fit GBs upon GBs, you can make the graphics 10x better, along with the audio and detail.
If the game was multiplatform; you would see no difference in graphics.
no shit you wont see a difference. It's made for xbox first then ported into ps3 and then shipped at the same time. Now if they took time and made both to their specs, then you would see the difference big time in games, but that takes to long so company's don't do that. Bioshock 1 was done that way and looked hell of a lot better on the PS3. Bioshock 2 wasn't and looked meh. company's save time and money porting and it sucks.
Activision is as mainstream as gaming gets. They take their most popular franchises and milk the shit out of them. Just look at what happened to the Tony Hawk series and what's now happening to the COD series.
Comments
Lets port it to 360 and compress everything herp derp. PS3 has no compression thx to blu ray and since you can fit GBs upon GBs, you can make the graphics 10x better, along with the audio and detail.