and thats a fair belief, i have no problem with it. but youve died before?? No. so you cant be positive. you have to at least admit there are things in existence that we have yet to even begin to comprehend in this world wouldnt you agree??
and thats a fair belief, i have no problem with it. but youve died before?? No. so you cant be positive. you have to at least admit there are things in existence that we have yet to even begin to comprehend in this world wouldnt you agree??
we make new discoveries as humans as years go by. i dont know why you couldnt just say that "the existence of a god, heaven, or life after death is very unlikely, but i cannot say for sure 100 percent either way" which is the most sensible answer you could give
ok i'm 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% sure god doesn't exsist but their is a possibility about the same odds as our sun exploding in the next 100 million years that god does exist
it is pretty much a solid 100% fact that our sun will not die for at least 4-5 billion years and its 100% impossible for our sun to supernova, it simply does not have enough mass
drinkwine732Posts: 20,418destroyer of motherfuckers
it is pretty much a solid 100% fact that our sun will not die for at least 4-5 billion years and its 100% impossible for our sun to supernova, it simply does not have enough mass
That's assuming astrophysics operates in a vacuum and all stars follow the star cycle, which is not the case.
Don't see a reason why ours wouldn't though...
Also, yielding that there are things that we do not understand in the universe is not a comprehensible argument for the existence of a God, if anything, it is an argument against one.
Comments
happy?
Don't see a reason why ours wouldn't though...
Also, yielding that there are things that we do not understand in the universe is not a comprehensible argument for the existence of a God, if anything, it is an argument against one.