I'm not gonna even argue with a fan of a team who can't even win a game up 2 touchdown's in the fourth cause their QB fumbles and throws picks like Favre.
My team was down 4 scores with 8minutes to go in the fourth last year against the Giants and came back and won, led by Vick.
drinkwine732Posts: 20,418destroyer of motherfuckers
edited September 2011
and you could argue... Henne McCoy Hasslebeck Cutler Freeman McNabb Kolb Newton
Whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa
I would only rather have Freeman, but that's because his youth is important.
Find me a person who would argue that newton Newton, the kid with only one start against arguably the worst defense in the game right now, is a better QB than Romo. Find me a person calling McNabb, the QB who just passed 7/15 for 39 yards in his latest start, better than Romo. Are you calling Henne, the player who's fans were clamoring to get rid of in favor of Kyle Orton, better than Tony Romo? No one should be close to arguing those.
Also, no way are Orton, Cassel and Sanchez are better than Romo. Romo on the Jets would tear shit up.
Kinda like what Vick did in the 4th against the Packers? HEY OH!
lol, just ignore one of the best comebacks in NFL history.
Vick had his team within 6 points of winning that game. If Akers makes those fieldgoals, we win. Theres a difference between a mistake(what Vick did) and a failure(what Romo is).
If you replaced Romo with Henne, you would have an 0-16 team.
The cowboys have and had a better team around Romo then the Dolphins have had. And the Dolphins havent gone 0-16. Kitna even looked better then Romo last year, the cowgirls didnt start looking better till Romo got injured.
drinkwine732Posts: 20,418destroyer of motherfuckers
edited September 2011
Kinda like what Vick did in the 4th against the Packers? HEY OH!
lol, just ignore one of the best comebacks in NFL history.
Usually the best comebacks in NFL history have the team that was losing winning the game, not still losing it.
If you replaced Romo with Henne, you would have an 0-16 team.
The cowboys have and had a better team around Romo then the Dolphins have had. And the Dolphins havent gone 0-16. Kitna even looked better then Romo last year, the cowgirls didnt start looking better till Romo got injured.
I disagree. The Dolphins have actually been fairly equipped to succeed for a long time, have far more OL and Secondary talent than the cowboys, have had a fairly dynamic rusher, as well as an underrated front seven. Dallas has masked their poor talent with relatively solid QB play and smart offensive play calling.
Romo sucks, is overrated and nothing more then a backup. He's had the weapons and tools to win, but fails every time. /
I'd gladly take Romo off anyone's hands, and after Vick regresses, something tells me you will too.
Kinda like what Vick did in the 4th against the Packers? HEY OH!
lol, just ignore one of the best comebacks in NFL history.
Usually the best comebacks in NFL history have the team that was losing winning the game, not still losing it.
I was talking about the Giants game.
If you replaced Romo with Henne, you would have an 0-16 team.
The cowboys have and had a better team around Romo then the Dolphins have had. And the Dolphins havent gone 0-16. Kitna even looked better then Romo last year, the cowgirls didnt start looking better till Romo got injured.
I disagree. The Dolphins have actually been fairly equipped to succeed for a long time, have far more OL and Secondary talent than the cowboys, have had a fairly dynamic rusher, as well as an underrated front seven. Dallas has masked their poor talent with relatively solid QB play and smart offensive play calling.
I will give you that Dallas O-line has been shitty and has only gotten worse since they had to cut players, but I disagree with all other postitions. They have had a solid D for many years and playmakers on that D. Their offensive weapons and running game has been solid(better then the Eagles in the past few years before McCoy, Jackson, ect..) Romo may play great when it doesnt matter, but when it does, he throws it away. He won 1 playoff game aginst the Eagles against a team with their foot already out the door and 11 starters injured. Then got spankked hard the following week.
Romo sucks, is overrated and nothing more then a backup. He's had the weapons and tools to win, but fails every time. /
I'd gladly take Romo off anyone's hands, and after Vick regresses, something tells me you will too.
Romo has never progressed, he's always been the guy who plays well in non-factor situations. Where Vick has progressed bigtime in the past 2 years. He is not the same guy in Atlanta, which some of you find it very hard to believe, just look at his stats. The only problem on that team is o-line. If they can work that out, Eagles will be great.
Vick > Romo anyday of the week. I'd rather have Alex Smith on the Eagles offense then Romo. Face it people. He's just not that good.
If you replaced Romo with Henne, you would have an 0-16 team.
henne is a decent QB...his stats are almost identical and in some cases better then sanchez and ditry gets all the praise cause his team is good.....henne works hard and will be a good QB in this league
Comments
My team was down 4 scores with 8minutes to go in the fourth last year against the Giants and came back and won, led by Vick.
whoa
whoa
whoa
whoa
I would only rather have Freeman, but that's because his youth is important.
Find me a person who would argue that newton Newton, the kid with only one start against arguably the worst defense in the game right now, is a better QB than Romo. Find me a person calling McNabb, the QB who just passed 7/15 for 39 yards in his latest start, better than Romo. Are you calling Henne, the player who's fans were clamoring to get rid of in favor of Kyle Orton, better than Tony Romo? No one should be close to arguing those.
Also, no way are Orton, Cassel and Sanchez are better than Romo. Romo on the Jets would tear shit up.
Vick had his team within 6 points of winning that game. If Akers makes those fieldgoals, we win. Theres a difference between a mistake(what Vick did) and a failure(what Romo is).
I will give you that Dallas O-line has been shitty and has only gotten worse since they had to cut players, but I disagree with all other postitions. They have had a solid D for many years and playmakers on that D. Their offensive weapons and running game has been solid(better then the Eagles in the past few years before McCoy, Jackson, ect..) Romo may play great when it doesnt matter, but when it does, he throws it away. He won 1 playoff game aginst the Eagles against a team with their foot already out the door and 11 starters injured. Then got spankked hard the following week.
I'd gladly take Romo off anyone's hands, and after Vick regresses, something tells me you will too.
Romo has never progressed, he's always been the guy who plays well in non-factor situations. Where Vick has progressed bigtime in the past 2 years. He is not the same guy in Atlanta, which some of you find it very hard to believe, just look at his stats. The only problem on that team is o-line. If they can work that out, Eagles will be great.
Vick > Romo anyday of the week. I'd rather have Alex Smith on the Eagles offense then Romo. Face it people. He's just not that good.
henne is a decent QB...his stats are almost identical and in some cases better then sanchez and ditry gets all the praise cause his team is good.....henne works hard and will be a good QB in this league