But look at it. Can a man and a man, or a woman and a woman make a baby. No. I didn't go in to blowjobs, handjobs, sex for pleasure or anything...That was all I meant. It doesn't assume anything, it states an obvious fact that you learn when you ask mommy 'where do babies come from.' Should it matter? No. If they were to want a child, they could adopt, or even go through artificial insemination.
Wine, I agree with you, but Chuck said nothing wrong. Although anal and oral sex are considered "normal" with heterosexual couples, they still are not "scientifically right" because the purpose of sex is to reproduce. I agree that people should be able to do whatever they want sexually/etc but the penis and vagina were designed for sexual purposes, the anus and mouth were not. It just so happens they are good alternatives for some people.
Ok, back to the tours.
TUPAC IS DEAD/THE LEGEND IS GONE/THEY SAYIN TUPAC'S BACK?/DEM NIGGAS WRONG
Wine are you gay? You're getting extremely defensive about the topic. -_-.
Anyways, I have no problem with a man and a man or a woman and a woman loving each other. I also think it's totally fine for them to get married. But this argument is pointless, people are gonna have their own opinions on the matter, you can't change that. The argument should just be dropped now.
drinkwine732Posts: 20,418destroyer of motherfuckers
No, I'm not gay, although I'm extremely frustrated on the issue. A state with a huge amount of gay people passing a shit piece of legislation will do that to you.
I wouldn't say I'm getting defensive, but I'm arguing my point very strongly, I will agree.
Wine are you gay? You're getting extremely defensive about the topic. -_-.
Anyways, I have no problem with a man and a man or a woman and a woman loving each other. I also think it's totally fine for them to get married. But this argument is pointless, people are gonna have their own opinions on the matter, you can't change that. The argument should just be dropped now.
Can someone not hold strong opinions about an issue that may not directly affect them? I'm glad I don't think the same way you do "slip_knot".
Also, the argument isn't pointless, it's a major human rights issue in this country. With that logic we might as well have ignored the civil rights movement in the 50's because "people are gonna have their own opinions". It's a stupid argument you're making as to why it shouldn't be discussed.
Wine are you gay? You're getting extremely defensive about the topic. -_-.
Anyways, I have no problem with a man and a man or a woman and a woman loving each other. I also think it's totally fine for them to get married. But this argument is pointless, people are gonna have their own opinions on the matter, you can't change that. The argument should just be dropped now.
Can someone not hold strong opinions about an issue that may not directly affect them? I'm glad I don't think the same way you do "slip_knot".
Also, the argument isn't pointless, it's a major human rights issue in this country. With that logic we might as well have ignored the civil rights movement in the 50's because "people are gonna have their own opinions". It's a stupid argument you're making as to why it shouldn't be discussed.
Times have changed though, the discrimination and segregation in the 50's against African Americans was wayyyyyyyyyyyy worse than the discrimination of homosexual/lesbian people today. You have to be a moron to not agree with that. I don't see different drinking fountains for straights/gays. The discrimination in the 50s and before was miles more extreme than it is now.
Comments
I'm breaking my own rule here. I'm done discussing homosexuality in this thread.
Should it matter? No. If they were to want a child, they could adopt, or even go through artificial insemination.
Ok, back to the tours.
that's my 2 cents
Anyways, I have no problem with a man and a man or a woman and a woman loving each other. I also think it's totally fine for them to get married. But this argument is pointless, people are gonna have their own opinions on the matter, you can't change that. The argument should just be dropped now.
I wouldn't say I'm getting defensive, but I'm arguing my point very strongly, I will agree.
Also, the argument isn't pointless, it's a major human rights issue in this country. With that logic we might as well have ignored the civil rights movement in the 50's because "people are gonna have their own opinions". It's a stupid argument you're making as to why it shouldn't be discussed.
Bro...s...
SUMMIT MUSIC HALL W/ ALL THAT REMAINS DENVER, CO
SUNSHINE THEATRE W/ ALL THAT REMAINS ALBUQUERQUE, NM
PHOENIX EVENT COMPLEX W/ ALL THAT REMAINS PHOENIX, AZ
EMO'S W/ ALL THAT REMAINS AUSTIN, TX
WAREHOUSE LIVE W/ ALL THAT REMAINS HOUSTON, TX
THE PALLADIUM SHOWROOM W/ ALL THAT REMAINS DALLAS, TX
THE MASQUERADE W/ ALL THAT REMAINS ATLANTA, GA
THE CLUB AT FIRESTONE W/ ALL THAT REMAINS ORLANDO, FL
AMOS' SOUTHEND W/ ALL THAT REMAINS CHARLOTTE, NC
WEBSTER THEATRE W/ ALL THAT REMAINS HARTFORD, CT