Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

31 US troops die in Afghanistan; many from unit that killed bin Laden

HOODSHOODS Posts: 41,866 destroyer of motherfuckers
edited August 2011 in Off Topic
7 Afghan commandos are also killed; Chinook crash appears to be deadliest single incident in the decade-long war

KABUL, Afghanistan — A NATO helicopter crash in Afghanistan on Saturday killing 31 U.S. special-forces troops, including more than 20 Navy SEALS from the unit that killed Osama bin Laden, and 7 Afghan commandos.

It was the deadliest single combat incident for American troops in 10 years of war, according to an American official.

The operators from SEAL Team Six were flown by a crew of the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regimen, according to U.S. officials who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because families are still being notified of the loss of their loved ones.

One source said the team was thought to include 22 SEALs, three Air Force air controllers, seven Afghan Army troops, a dog and his handler, and a civilian interpreter, plus the helicopter crew.

The sources thought this was the largest single loss of life ever for SEAL Team Six, known as the Naval Special Warfare Development Group.

A brief statement from the presidential palace said the helicopter had crashed in central Wardak province, an area west of Kabul. The volatile region is known for its strong Taliban presence.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai "shared his deep sorrow and sadness" with U.S. counterpart Barack Obama and the families of the U.S. and Afghan victims, the statement said. Obama, who learned of the deaths while at Camp David, mourned the deaths of the 7 Afghan soldiers killed, and issued a written statement saying Americans' thoughts and prayers go out to the families of those who perished.

Advertise | AdChoicesAdvertise | AdChoices
Advertise | AdChoices
.The crash is a reminder of the "extraordinary sacrifices" being made by America's military and its families, Obama wrote.

The Taliban claimed to have shot down the troop-carrying Chinook helicopter during a firefight. The Islamist group also said in a statement that eight insurgents had been killed in the battle.

NBC News quoted a Taliban spokesman as claiming the U.S. troops were attacking a compound that was housing militants when the aircraft was brought down. However, the Taliban has been known to make exaggerated claims in the past.

'Enemy activity in the area'
The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) confirmed the overnight incident and said there "was enemy activity in the area." But it said it was still investigating the cause. The alliance was conducting a recovery operation at the site, it said, without releasing details or a casualty figure.

"We are aware of an incident involving a helicopter in eastern Afghanistan," said U.S. Air Force Capt. Justin Brockhoff, a NATO spokesman. "We are in the process of accessing the facts."

The helicopter was a twin-rotor Chinook, which are used for transport, said an official at NATO headquarters in Brussels, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The Chinook was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade, a military source reportedly told the New York Times.

Gen. Abdul Qayoom Baqizoy, police chief of Wardak, told the Times that the joint NATO-Afghan operation began around 1 a.m. Saturday with an attack on a Taliban compound in the village of Jaw-e-mekh Zareen.

He said the resulting firefight lasted at least two hours.

The majority of foreign troops in Wardak, which comes under ISAF's eastern regional command, are American.

The Washington Post reported that a second coalition helicopter made a "precautionary landing" Saturday in Afghanistan's Khost province. Brockhoff, the NATO spokesman, said the helicopter sustained minor damage and no injuries were reported. He rejected Taliban claims that the second aircraft had been shot down.

Aircraft crashes are relatively frequent in Afghanistan, where insecurity and difficult terrain make air travel essential for coalition forces transporting troops and equipment.

There have been at least 17 coalition and Afghan aircraft crashes in Afghanistan this year. Most of the crashes are attributed to pilot errors, weather conditions or mechanical failures. However, the coalition has confirmed that at least one CH-47F Chinook helicopter was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade on July 25, injuring two crewmembers.

Growing unease
The incident comes only two weeks after the start of a gradual process of handing security responsibility from foreign forces to Afghan troops and police, and at a time of growing unease about the increasingly unpopular and costly war.

That process is due to end with all foreign combat troops leaving Afghanistan by the end of 2014, but some U.S. lawmakers have already questioned whether that handover is fast enough.

The crash was by far the worst incident of the war for foreign troops and easily surpassed the worst incidents of battlefield losses.

In April 2005, another CH-47 Chinook helicopter crashed, killing 15 U.S. servicemen and three civilian contractors. Another Chinook crash in June the same year killed 17 U.S. troops.

U.S. and other NATO commanders have claimed success in reversing the momentum of a growing insurgency in the Taliban heartland in the south, although insurgents have shown a worrying ability to adapt their tactics and mount major attacks in other areas.

Those gains, however, have come at a price, with 711 foreign troops killed in Afghanistan in 2010, easily the deadliest year of the war for all concerned since the Taliban were toppled by U.S.-backed foreign troops in late 2001.

The crash in Wardak means that at least 374 foreign troops have been killed so far in 2011, more than two-thirds of them American, according to independent monitor www.icasualties.com and figures kept by Reuters.

Despite the alarming military toll, ordinary Afghan civilians have continued to bear the brunt of the war, with civilian casualties also hitting record levels in the first six months of this year, according to U.N. figures.

Earlier on Saturday, Afghan police said a NATO airstrike killed eight civilians in southern Helmand province on Friday.

ISAF confirmed there had been an airstrike in Helmand's Nad Ali district and said it was investigating whether civilians had been present at the time. Helmand, a Taliban stronghold, is the deadliest province in Afghanistan for international troops.


Civilian casualties caused by foreign troops hunting Taliban fighters and other insurgents have long been a major source of friction between Kabul and its Western backers.

Nad Ali district police chief Shidi Khan said the airstrike was called in after insurgents attacked ISAF troops in the area.




In this photograph taken on March 30, 2011, two U.S. army Chinook helicopters land at Kandahar airfield in southern Afghanistan.

image

«1

Comments

  • MetalCoresadesMetalCoresades Posts: 57,706 spicy boy
    shit
    Do You Like Hurting Other People?
  • StratophonyStratophony Posts: 9,212 just the tip
    smells like a conspiracy.... to prevent from anybody speaking up on what really happened in that "fortress"
  • EpisodeEpisode Posts: 32,049 destroyer of motherfuckers
    Started in the crack house, Obama went the back route.
    Kill Bin Laden? 'Nother 4 up in the Black House.
  • SkullAndCrossbonesSkullAndCrossbones Posts: 16,452 destroyer of motherfuckers
    that sucks. fuckin' taliban cocksuckers.
    "That's another thing I love about metal, it's so fuckin' huge yet certain people don't even know it exists." - Rob Zombie
  • streetsstreets Posts: 3,351 just the tip
    fucking towel-heads
  • XenoXeno Posts: 21,031 master of ceremonies
    Started in the crack house, Obama went the back route.
    Kill Bin Laden? 'Nother 4 up in the Black House.
    Yeah. Those Hawaiian crack houses.
  • DeceasedFantasyDeceasedFantasy Posts: 157 salt miner
    well this may sound possibly crazy, but i think our own government planted those insurgent to blow up the helicopter that was carrying the men who took part in the "killing of osama bin laden" to take care of loose ends because we never really did kill osama. if we did their would of been pictures. and their were no pics because we probably didnt and now the only men who really could of said yeah we did or no we didn't are dead
  • NecrothulhuNecrothulhu Posts: 33,444 master of ceremonies
    well this may sound possibly crazy, but i think our own government planted those insurgent to blow up the helicopter that was carrying the men who took part in the "killing of osama bin laden" to take care of loose ends because we never really did kill osama. if we did their would of been pictures. and their were no pics because we probably didnt and now the only men who really could of said yeah we did or no we didn't are dead
    makes sense

    *there
    imageimage
  • SkullAndCrossbonesSkullAndCrossbones Posts: 16,452 destroyer of motherfuckers
    edited August 2011
    well this may sound possibly crazy, but i think our own government planted those insurgent to blow up the helicopter that was carrying the men who took part in the "killing of osama bin laden" to take care of loose ends because we never really did kill osama. if we did their would of been pictures. and their were no pics because we probably didnt and now the only men who really could of said yeah we did or no we didn't are dead
    makes sense

    *there
    eh, i dont really buy it. why would pakistan so damn pissed if it didnt happen?
    "That's another thing I love about metal, it's so fuckin' huge yet certain people don't even know it exists." - Rob Zombie
  • NecrothulhuNecrothulhu Posts: 33,444 master of ceremonies
    well this may sound possibly crazy, but i think our own government planted those insurgent to blow up the helicopter that was carrying the men who took part in the "killing of osama bin laden" to take care of loose ends because we never really did kill osama. if we did their would of been pictures. and their were no pics because we probably didnt and now the only men who really could of said yeah we did or no we didn't are dead
    makes sense

    *there
    eh, i dont really buy it. why would pakistan so damn pissed if it didnt happen?
    I would think it's multiple reasons. Number one, someone killed Osama and we took credit. Number two, alot of them don't like us especially the taliban or whatever they call themselves nowadays. And if our government pays the enemy to kill our own so they don't speak the truth then it isn't surprising to me that they'd do it
    imageimage
  • rammstein516rammstein516 Posts: 3,720 juggalo
    We never landed on the moon, I swear. I know this because I was there and have access to such information.
  • TravisTravis Posts: 4,971 balls deep
    .....kinda hard for the Taliban to shoot down a chopper and kill troops if the chopper and troops are here on US soil; where they SHOULD ALL BE....
  • SATANSATAN Posts: 25,824 spicy boy
    you guys are assuming that this really did happen. ever see 'wag the dog'?
  • Ace_Deputy_CheezeAce_Deputy_Cheeze Posts: 14,736 jayfacer
    edited August 2011
    well this may sound possibly crazy, but i think our own government planted those insurgent to blow up the helicopter that was carrying the men who took part in the "killing of osama bin laden" to take care of loose ends because we never really did kill osama. if we did their would of been pictures. and their were no pics because we probably didnt and now the only men who really could of said yeah we did or no we didn't are dead
    makes sense

    *there
    eh, i dont really buy it. why would pakistan so damn pissed if it didnt happen?
    I would think it's multiple reasons. Number one, someone killed Osama and we took credit. Number two, alot of them don't like us especially the taliban or whatever they call themselves nowadays. And if our government pays the enemy to kill our own so they don't speak the truth then it isn't surprising to me that they'd do it
    Theory kinda goes out the window since it says the people who died were part of the Seal team six unit not the ones who got Osama
    Deputy_Cheeze's Profile Page Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket
  • NecrothulhuNecrothulhu Posts: 33,444 master of ceremonies
    Oh well
    0 fucks
    imageimage
  • Chicken_FuckerChicken_Fucker Posts: 15,691 destroyer of motherfuckers
    This is so sad. Seal team 6 are extraordinary people. It sucks to have it end like this for them.
  • ShaneShane Posts: 15,229 balls deep
    well this may sound possibly crazy, but i think our own government planted those insurgent to blow up the helicopter that was carrying the men who took part in the "killing of osama bin laden" to take care of loose ends because we never really did kill osama. if we did their would of been pictures. and their were no pics because we probably didnt and now the only men who really could of said yeah we did or no we didn't are dead
    makes sense

    *there
    eh, i dont really buy it. why would pakistan so damn pissed if it didnt happen?
    I would think it's multiple reasons. Number one, someone killed Osama and we took credit. Number two, alot of them don't like us especially the taliban or whatever they call themselves nowadays. And if our government pays the enemy to kill our own so they don't speak the truth then it isn't surprising to me that they'd do it
    Pakistani is pissed because we preformed a unilateral military action on their countries soil without consent . they saw it as an insult to their sovereignty.
  • Stoned_CatzStoned_Catz Posts: 34,915 jayfacer
    edited August 2011
    fukk pakistan fukk em.... they should nuke the fukkin place

    u know whats fukkin insulting pakistan fukkin knew Bin Laden was fukkin there and didnt tell nobody


    [-(

    blue turbins

    From Those Fishes - I Fingered An Old Bitch (i got Aids on my finger)


  • Shanez_WifeShanez_Wife Posts: 2,008 just the tip
    I feel bad for the doggy.
Sign In or Register to comment.