Rogerian argument is a conflict solving technique based on finding common ground instead of polarizing debate.
This type of discussion is extremely useful in emotionally charged topics since it downplays emotional and highlights rational arguments.[2]
Young, Becker and Pike identified four stages:[4]
An introduction to the problem and a demonstration that the opponent's position is understood.
A statement of the contexts in which the opponent's position may be valid.
A statement of the writer's position, including the contexts in which it is valid.
A statement of how the opponent's position would benefit if he were to adopt elements of the writer's position. If the writer can show that the positions complement each other, that each supplies what the other lacks, so much the better.
I WAS THINKING ABOUT ABORTION OR GAYS IN THE MILITARY
ANY SUGGESTIONS?
0 ·
Comments
I JUST HOPE THE WHOLE CLASS DOES NOT DO IT ON THE SAME SUBJECT
SHOULD FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS FUND CULTURAL EVENTS?
THIS IS ONLY A 3 PAGE PAPER SO REALLY FOCUSING ON A VERY SPECIFIC TOPIC IS HELPFUL
IS POPULATION GOING TO NEED TO BE CONTROLLED IN THE NEAR FUTURE?
SO I WOULD NEED TO FIND SOME PRO GENOCIDE MATERIAL?
I MUST SHOW BOTH SIDES OF THE ISSUE
COULD WORK
I DONT THINK MY TEACHER WOULD LIKE THIS SUBJECT MATTER AND I WANT THE A
THEY WILL PEOPLE AGAINST IT
AND THEIR WILL BE SMART PEOPLE
THERE YOU HAVE IT 2 SIDES TO THE ARGUMENT
BUT AWESOME ISSUE IT IS