Flacco has been in the league for 4 years while Ben has been in the league for what 9 years? of course he is going to be better and have better stats you retard
ben's QB rating for his first 5 years is better then flacco's. and ben has only played a full 16 game season twice. flacco has played all 16 games in his first five seasons
"That's another thing I love about metal, it's so fuckin' huge yet certain people don't even know it exists." - Rob Zombie
last years was an even played game the whole game with one pulling it out in the end. don't like the results for last year, but it was a good game. Watching the Ravens play is like watching elderly pron
WakeOfAshesPosts: 21,665destroyer of motherfuckers
Personally I think Anquan Boldin easily should have won the MVP. The catches that dude made during the game were insane. At least twice I remember thinking "holy shit, how'd he turn that into a reception?". Felt that Flacco just played a good game, but nothing to write home to mom about. I mean yeah, he didnt fuck it up like he does from time to time, but he wasnt exactly all that spectacular either. Boldin on the other hand just about won that game for them. It sure wasnt Ray Rice or Ray Lewis getting them to the promised land.
Had SF won though, Kaepernick was the only real MVP choice on that side of the field.
Comments
http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/careerstats
flacco's career stats
http://www.nfl.com/player/joeflacco/382/careerstats
roethlisberger is obviously better
EDIT: plus my whole point was that roethlisberger is better regardless of how many more years that he's been in the league
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3c7_1359947671
Had SF won though, Kaepernick was the only real MVP choice on that side of the field.