I like it.... and I am targeting him for a late round fantasy sleeper rb. Dallas's line made Murray a lot better than he really is.... And Oakland has had a solid history of making RB's look much worse then they are. At this point in time, I would absolutely want Murray over McFadden, however I would not be one bit surprised if McFadden put up killer numbers in Dallas. Maybe even better than Murray.
And really getting to the bottom line... What they are paying McFadden verses what they would have had to pay Murray to keep him in Dallas. Bravo Dallas, Bravo.
Note - Dallas is my second most hated team. I have 10x the hate for the Stealers, however I have no love for Dallas and I enjoy watching them miss the playoffs or get eliminated every year. So for me to complement their roster choices, that's kinda saying a lot.
When murray was killing it, my dad kept saying he was going to buy a murray jersey. I told him to hold off and it paid off. For awhile I was regretting getting Lee over Murray. Glad that worked out.
Damn the Dolphins are fucking morons. Suhs deal is only counting 6.1 million against the cap the first year. Second year it jumps all the way to 28.6 million. So basically if they don't want to be completely strapped against the cap they are going to have to restructure his deal in the second year. Which will kill them down the line )
also so apperantly one of the main reasons he left was because he didn't feel like the organization had his back after the first stomp )
Depends on when the guarantees are in the contract. If the guarantees are early, they can restructure them to later in the contract and lower that 28.6M cap hit. Then, if he is still performing, they can extend him and further spread out the cap hit. Otherwise, they can cut him and take the dead money.
I think their plan is probably to absorb a large amount of his cap hit ASAP, but not this year. Not sure I understand that though, considering they have to resign Tanehill.
Damn the Dolphins are fucking morons. Suhs deal is only counting 6.1 million against the cap the first year. Second year it jumps all the way to 28.6 million. So basically if they don't want to be completely strapped against the cap they are going to have to restructure his deal in the second year. Which will kill them down the line )
also so apperantly one of the main reasons he left was because he didn't feel like the organization had his back after the first stomp )
Depends on when the guarantees are in the contract. If the guarantees are early, they can restructure them to later in the contract and lower that 28.6M cap hit. Then, if he is still performing, they can extend him and further spread out the cap hit. Otherwise, they can cut him and take the dead money.
I think their plan is probably to absorb a large amount of his cap hit ASAP, but not this year. Not sure I understand that though, considering they have to resign Tanehill.
not giving him that deal > giving him Any where close to that deal
Comments
I think their plan is probably to absorb a large amount of his cap hit ASAP, but not this year. Not sure I understand that though, considering they have to resign Tanehill.
pretty easy
He already has plans to take a pay cut. he wants to be here.