I think Hilary might win just because we'll have people voting for her cuz shes a female. The "we got the first black president, we want the first female president now" mentality.
Bush, Clinton, Trump whoever wins we lose. AvP
I'd put the odds of Hilary winning at about 70%.
The Republicans just don't "get it". They think they can stay true to their unchanging platform, and that they will eventually get back in because we are tired of Democrats. Historically speaking I would say they arent too far off on this, except Ross Perot in the 90's kinda changed that game and they are too stupid to realize it. Although Ross didn't win, he gave hope and legitimacy to third party candidates and now the third party voters aren't big enough to win but they also arent giving their vote to the big 2. This voter loss by the big 2 does impact both parties, however Republicans are hit more hard by this.
If Republicans want to get back into the office they absolutely need to embrace libertarianism and pick a candidate that is more libertarian aligned than your traditional Republican. You see if you have a libertarian running as a Republican, then you get 100% of the libertarian vote and 100% of the Republican vote because who else are they going to vote for? a Republican would not vote for a democrat because the R candidate is too libertarian leaning. On the flip side, if they go their usual route and have jeb Bush be their candidate, then you have the same R's voting for him (because that doesnt change) but you just lost the entire libertarian vote.
The longer it takes for Republicans to realize they need to win libertarians to their party, the longer it will be before we see another Republican president. The only candidate that has any remote chance of beating Hillary (or whatever democrat candidate ends up being it) is Rand Paul. He's literally their only chance, but the party leaders are putting all their eggs in the Bush basket.
Rand has integrity and I trust him but his policies are horrible for this country at the moment ron Paul was cool and all but he sucks balls compared to bernie
I think Hilary might win just because we'll have people voting for her cuz shes a female. The "we got the first black president, we want the first female president now" mentality.
Bush, Clinton, Trump whoever wins we lose. AvP
I'd put the odds of Hilary winning at about 70%.
The Republicans just don't "get it". They think they can stay true to their unchanging platform, and that they will eventually get back in because we are tired of Democrats. Historically speaking I would say they arent too far off on this, except Ross Perot in the 90's kinda changed that game and they are too stupid to realize it. Although Ross didn't win, he gave hope and legitimacy to third party candidates and now the third party voters aren't big enough to win but they also arent giving their vote to the big 2. This voter loss by the big 2 does impact both parties, however Republicans are hit more hard by this.
If Republicans want to get back into the office they absolutely need to embrace libertarianism and pick a candidate that is more libertarian aligned than your traditional Republican. You see if you have a libertarian running as a Republican, then you get 100% of the libertarian vote and 100% of the Republican vote because who else are they going to vote for? a Republican would not vote for a democrat because the R candidate is too libertarian leaning. On the flip side, if they go their usual route and have jeb Bush be their candidate, then you have the same R's voting for him (because that doesnt change) but you just lost the entire libertarian vote.
The longer it takes for Republicans to realize they need to win libertarians to their party, the longer it will be before we see another Republican president. The only candidate that has any remote chance of beating Hillary (or whatever democrat candidate ends up being it) is Rand Paul. He's literally their only chance, but the party leaders are putting all their eggs in the Bush basket.
Hilary Could win a 4 year term just to make the public happy for having a women president.
I don't think its going to matter if republicans realize they need to win over the libertarians when the fix is in doe.
Rand has integrity and I trust him but his policies are horrible for this country at the moment ron Paul was cool and all but he sucks balls compared to bernie
I don't disagree about his policies and I don't consider him an ideal candidate. He would get my vote though because I would be hoping that his shitty policies were a ploy to fool the Republican party into thinking he is willing to play game with them. Then when he gets elected then he starts being much closer aligned to where his father is..... That's why I'd give him my vote, and I'd be disappointed if his policies are actually what he believes.
Although Rand isnt an ideal candidate, he is close enough to snag the majority of the libertarian and independent vote which could be enough to win the election. The R's literally have no other option IMHO.
The only reason why I put Hillary's odds at 70% was because the democratic race might be closer for her then the presidential.
Rand has integrity and I trust him but his policies are horrible for this country at the moment ron Paul was cool and all but he sucks balls compared to bernie
I don't disagree about his policies and I don't consider him an ideal candidate. He would get my vote though because I would be hoping that his shitty policies were a ploy to fool the Republican party into thinking he is willing to play game with them.
Nah the presidential race will be close.. People fall in line at the end.. The electoral swing states might all go to Hilary which is what scares the repubs but the pop vote will still be like 46 to 48.. Hilary still wins tho minus a big fuck up
rand loses me on government intervention with business. C'mon now we cannot leave corporations in charge of running themselves for the love of god. Govt needs to keep the money in check so we can at least still have a fucking middle class.. Paul doesn't even believe in a national minimum wage yea I'm all set in not being even more of a corporate slave thanks
Yeaaa no.. It's because she still has all her big money ties with some of the richest and most evil corporate entities in the country, same as Obama .. She's already bought and sold so no real changes in things we need to save us like banking and bringing jobs home is ever going to happen.. She'll just blow the big unions and collect her mils
She has accepted cash donations from foreign governments
Shes an endless liar (yeah like the rest of them) for example, Irish peach process, Benghazi, she lied about being under sniper fire, hell she even lied about her daughters location on 9/11
She supported and pushed for the 2009 Afganistan troop surge.
She has been a major supporter of drone strikes
Basically overall she is a terrible human. (like most of them lol)
Comments
Amazing compared to who is going to win is what i meant.
The Republicans just don't "get it". They think they can stay true to their unchanging platform, and that they will eventually get back in because we are tired of Democrats. Historically speaking I would say they arent too far off on this, except Ross Perot in the 90's kinda changed that game and they are too stupid to realize it. Although Ross didn't win, he gave hope and legitimacy to third party candidates and now the third party voters aren't big enough to win but they also arent giving their vote to the big 2. This voter loss by the big 2 does impact both parties, however Republicans are hit more hard by this.
If Republicans want to get back into the office they absolutely need to embrace libertarianism and pick a candidate that is more libertarian aligned than your traditional Republican. You see if you have a libertarian running as a Republican, then you get 100% of the libertarian vote and 100% of the Republican vote because who else are they going to vote for? a Republican would not vote for a democrat because the R candidate is too libertarian leaning. On the flip side, if they go their usual route and have jeb Bush be their candidate, then you have the same R's voting for him (because that doesnt change) but you just lost the entire libertarian vote.
The longer it takes for Republicans to realize they need to win libertarians to their party, the longer it will be before we see another Republican president. The only candidate that has any remote chance of beating Hillary (or whatever democrat candidate ends up being it) is Rand Paul. He's literally their only chance, but the party leaders are putting all their eggs in the Bush basket.
ron Paul was cool and all but he sucks balls compared to bernie
I don't think its going to matter if republicans realize they need to win over the libertarians when the fix is in doe.
[-(
blue turbins
From Those Fishes - I Fingered An Old Bitch (i got Aids on my finger)
Although Rand isnt an ideal candidate, he is close enough to snag the majority of the libertarian and independent vote which could be enough to win the election. The R's literally have no other option IMHO.
The only reason why I put Hillary's odds at 70% was because the democratic race might be closer for her then the presidential.
rand loses me on government intervention with business. C'mon now we cannot leave corporations in charge of running themselves for the love of god. Govt needs to keep the money in check so we can at least still have a fucking middle class.. Paul doesn't even believe in a national minimum wage
yea I'm all set in not being even more of a corporate slave thanks
She has accepted cash donations from foreign governments
Shes an endless liar (yeah like the rest of them) for example, Irish peach process, Benghazi, she lied about being under sniper fire, hell she even lied about her daughters location on 9/11
She supported and pushed for the 2009 Afganistan troop surge.
She has been a major supporter of drone strikes
Basically overall she is a terrible human. (like most of them lol)
[-(
blue turbins
From Those Fishes - I Fingered An Old Bitch (i got Aids on my finger)